Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:13:45
Message-Id: 45EB5178.3000702@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting by Seemant Kulleen
1 Seemant Kulleen napsal(a):
2 > On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 07:32 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
3 >> I'm also curious as to why people should be expected to assign
4 >> copyright to a group that is known for licence violations and removing
5 >> attribution from documents. How does this protect anything?
6 >
7 > Yeah, you cry foul when people paint you with an overly broad brush. Is
8 > it known? As far as I remember, the issue was acknowledged when brought
9 > up, and then fixed. The issue hasn't come up again with your docs. It
10 > hasn't come up with any other thing.
11
12 Erm, to be precise here, noone has removed any ciaranm's attributions
13 from devmanual, they've all been moved to the end of the document
14 originally, so that people wouldn't be forced to scroll across one page
15 worth of contributors to get to the actual content of devmanual.
16
17 And of course this was a great occasion to start screaming about license
18 violation and demand bigger fonts on devmanual frontpage. [1]
19
20 As said, grow up.
21
22
23 [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150231#c5
24
25 --
26 Best regards,
27
28 Jakub Moc
29 mailto:jakub@g.o
30 GPG signature:
31 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
32 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
33
34 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>