Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: justin <jlec@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk 3 preparation work
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:02:46
Message-Id: 4D6E4DD7.10108@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk 3 preparation work by Nirbheek Chauhan
1 On 01/03/11 08:32, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
2 > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote:
3 >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
4 >>> On 11:13 Sun 27 Feb , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
5 >>>> a quick mail to announce that the gnome team, in order to prepare for
6 >>>> gnome 3, started slotting a lot of gnome team managed packages. If you
7 >>>> find yourself using such a package, please update your ebuilds to use
8 >>>> slot notations or other EAPI compliant notation resulting in the same
9 >>>> effect.
10 >>>
11 >>> This email would be much more useful if it included a list of affected
12 >>> packages, sorted by maintainer and/or herd.
13 >>>
14 >>
15 >> As requested, here is a (probably) complete list of packages which
16 >> depend on x11-libs/gtk+ without a slot. The list was generated using
17 >> the tinderbox rindex, so it may be slightly out of date.
18 >>
19 >
20 > I just realized that there was a bug in my script which caused the
21 > maintainer-sorted list to not group packages together. Attached is an
22 > updated list.
23 >
24
25 Things for
26
27
28 Herd: sci
29 Herd: sci-chemistry
30 Maintainer: markusle@g.o
31 Maintainer: cryos@g.o
32 Maintainer: jlec@g.o
33
34
35 are fixed.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk 3 preparation work Kevin McCarthy <signals@g.o>