| 1 |
On 12/31/2010 03:38 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Mike Frysinger<vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> personally, i dont see a problem here. what actual burden is there for |
| 4 |
>> continuing supporting EAPI 0/1 ? i dont think we should go around deprecating |
| 5 |
>> things for the pure fun of it. |
| 6 |
>> -mike |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> I tend to agree, unless of course the maintainers of the various |
| 9 |
> package managers chime in and say that some aspect of some particular |
| 10 |
> EAPI requires them to maintain a lot of legacy code. Then I'd be all |
| 11 |
> for dropping some. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I'm not a gentoo dev, but I tend to agree here. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Later, |
| 18 |
Gizmo |
Archives