1 |
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:21:29 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>On 8/13/19 1:53 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> thanks for the review. I've force-pushed the acct-user/apache commit |
6 |
>> with ACCT_USER_HOME_OWNER being set to root:root. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
> |
9 |
>Is there any benefit to |
10 |
> |
11 |
> ACCT_USER_HOME=/var/www |
12 |
> ACCT_USER_HOME_OWNER=root:root |
13 |
> |
14 |
>versus |
15 |
> |
16 |
> keepdir /var/www |
17 |
> |
18 |
>in the eclass? |
19 |
|
20 |
If we leave ACCT_USER_HOME empty HOME will be set to |
21 |
/dev/null for apache user. I don't know if this is what we want. |
22 |
|
23 |
>I think root:root is correct for /var/www, but setting it explicitly |
24 |
>will clobber any existing permissions that the administrator or other |
25 |
>packages have set. For example, if my web developers have write access |
26 |
>to /var/www via group membership, then when I install acct-user/apache, |
27 |
>/var/www will get set back to root:root with mode 755 and they'll be |
28 |
>locked out temporarily. |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
Lars |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Lars Wendler |
35 |
Gentoo package maintainer |
36 |
GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 |