Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] deprecation of SANDBOX_DISABLED
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 04:13:30
Message-Id: 1128399165.7607.4.camel@lycan.lan
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] deprecation of SANDBOX_DISABLED by Brian Harring
1 On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 03:05 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
2 > Hola.
3 >
4 > Subject says it all; SANDBOX_DISABLED functions as (essentially)
5 > RESTRICT="sandbox", except sandbox is left on for pkg_setup .
6 >
7 > This is pretty much redundant, considering it's usage. People stick
8 > it in the global scope; if you _must_ turn off the sandbox for a
9 > specific phase, use SANDBOX_ON=0/1 instead. If you need to disable
10 > sandbox across the board, restrict="sandbox" is your friend.
11 >
12 > Since there are still ebuilds in the tree that would be schmooked by
13 > it, it's not going to hit in the coming version, but I'd expect it to
14 > be dead next version after unless people have a really good reason why
15 > it should live on.
16 >
17 > So... thoughts? Yes it's minor, but it's a matter of cleaning
18 > up/simplifying portage code, and removing redundancy.
19 >
20
21 Sounds sane.
22
23
24 --
25 Martin Schlemmer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature