| 1 |
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I disagree. I think most of the developers are used to the lexical sort, |
| 4 |
> and it keeps the order predictable. While I suppose keeping amd64 |
| 5 |
> and x86 alongside for the sake of being commonly used would make sense, |
| 6 |
> I really have no clue how that would affect other arches. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
It is a trade-off, of course. My hypothesis is that it would be easier to |
| 10 |
use. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> By 'frequency' did you mean how many ebuilds are having the specific |
| 14 |
> keyword? Could you make some quick stats that would show how this would |
| 15 |
> look like right now? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Here's an estimation of the relative frequencies: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
amd64 (37201) |
| 21 |
x86 (33703) |
| 22 |
ppc (15347) |
| 23 |
arm (14387) |
| 24 |
ppc64 (11647) |
| 25 |
sparc (10054) |
| 26 |
alpha (9219) |
| 27 |
ia64 (8456) |
| 28 |
hppa (8410) |
| 29 |
arm64 (8194) |
| 30 |
amd64-linux (7716) |
| 31 |
mips (7602) |
| 32 |
x86-linux (7409) |
| 33 |
x86-fbsd (6102) |
| 34 |
sh (4885) |
| 35 |
s390 (4421) |
| 36 |
ppc-macos (4098) |
| 37 |
x86-macos (4028) |
| 38 |
amd64-fbsd (3361) |
| 39 |
x86-solaris (3202) |
| 40 |
x64-macos (3187) |
| 41 |
sparc-solaris (2464) |
| 42 |
x64-solaris (2208) |
| 43 |
m68k (2204) |
| 44 |
sparc64-solaris (1344) |
| 45 |
arm-linux (1135) |
| 46 |
ppc-aix (971) |
| 47 |
sparc-fbsd (902) |
| 48 |
m68k-mint (626) |
| 49 |
x64-cygwin (432) |
| 50 |
x86-winnt (123) |
| 51 |
x86-interix (5) |
| 52 |
x86-cygwin (5) |
| 53 |
ia64-hpux (5) |
| 54 |
ppc64-linux (4) |
| 55 |
arm64-linux (4) |
| 56 |
x86-freebsd (1) |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
Regards, |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
Dirkjan |
Archives