Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 1 of N: merging & git signing
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:05:07
Message-Id: 20120608110155.GA15249@odin.tremily.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 1 of N: merging & git signing by Rich Freeman
1 On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 04:57:42PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > 2. Hacker commits something to the tree. Top of tree is not signed.
3 > No need for preimage attacks or whatever on sha1 - they just log into
4 > the server and do a git commit or whatever right into the tree.
5 > 3. Gentoo dev commits a bunch of stuff to the tree. Top of tree is signed.
6
7 When the breach is discovered, you can then isolate the dev (or devs)
8 who implicitly signed the hack (2) by pulling the ToT without checking
9 for a valid signature (3). Then you yell at them for sloppy security,
10 and tell them to install your signature-checking post-receive hook.
11
12 Trevor
13
14 --
15 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
16 For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 1 of N: merging & git signing Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>