| 1 |
Le 28/12/2009 23:53, Fabio Erculiani a écrit : |
| 2 |
> Interesting, eventually somebody gave me a detailed and technical |
| 3 |
> explanation without [bla bla snip]. Thanks Rémi. |
| 4 |
> Yes, I agree with you that the best (and the one I would go for, too) |
| 5 |
> solution is adding support to a new *DEPEND, perhaps one that could |
| 6 |
> "host" build-deps only. It looks weird that other PMs out there do |
| 7 |
> that since 1994 (replace 1994 with older value). |
| 8 |
> Perhaps adding a big fat # XXX somewhere in ebuilds would have helped |
| 9 |
> us all in saving some time today. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
We could indeed, but back then we had something like 20~30 dupes so it |
| 12 |
felt like an obvious fix. I'll start adding comments in the overlay to |
| 13 |
clear it up. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> So, at least for now, I suspect I have to give up and close my shiny |
| 16 |
> 27 bugs. Right? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I'm afraid so, yes :) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
But if you do want to tackle the EAPI/PMS issue, feel free to reuse the |
| 21 |
tracker for that. I'll gladly tune in for that discussion. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Cheers, |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Rémi |
Archives