| 1 |
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 14:08 -0400, Eric Brown wrote: |
| 2 |
> My point is that Snort and Apache are not alone in this, so I suppose |
| 3 |
> quite a few upstream developers just disagree with us on what proper |
| 4 |
> initialization means. Why should our users suffer? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
They shouldn't, but that doesn't mean implementing some half-baked hack |
| 7 |
to resolve the situation. It might be better to instead patch the |
| 8 |
daemon in question and send the patches upstream. Upstream developers |
| 9 |
(usually) are much more willing to make changes when you've done the |
| 10 |
work for them... ;] |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 14 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
| 15 |
Games - Developer |
| 16 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives