| 1 |
On 06/12/19 15:41, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:51 AM Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 04:33:36 -0500 |
| 4 |
>> Tim Harder <radhermit@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> On 2019-12-06 Fri 04:03, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> it's not just like repoman and cvs since repoman commit did push ;) |
| 8 |
>>>> it will never be perfect but i really like repoman commit to refuse |
| 9 |
>>>> to even commit if there's something obviously wrong |
| 10 |
>>> I'm more of the opinion (and am working towards that practicality in |
| 11 |
>>> terms of runtime speed) that a subset of QA checks should be run as a |
| 12 |
>>> git hook which would cause push failures on certain classes of bad |
| 13 |
>>> commits. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> There should be both. Amending the 23rd commit message because one |
| 16 |
>> mistyped a semicolon is kind of a PITA. |
| 17 |
> It is? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> git rebase -i HEAD~23 |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Is that what you think is a pain in the ass, or do you not know about |
| 22 |
> interactive rebase? :) |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
I hope you're not suggesting a rebase of any sort in gentoo.git, Matt .... ;) |
Archives