Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>, robbat2@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 10/12] glep-0063: Make 2-yearly expiration term mandatory
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 06:28:25
Message-Id: robbat2-20180706T062558-927731260Z@orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 10/12] glep-0063: Make 2-yearly expiration term mandatory by "Michał Górny"
1 On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 08:18:32AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > > option a)
3 > > 2 years + N:
4 > > 2 weeks <= N <= 3 months.
5 > >
6 > > option b)
7 > > Change the wording to be 'at most 2 years' instead of 'exactly 2 years'.
8 > That *is* the wording.
9 I apologize. I took ulm's post as canonical and didn't confirm in the
10 original GLEP text.
11
12 Further change to follow in response to the original text.
13
14 > > Separately:
15 > > Is two weeks enough time for a new key distribution to users?
16 >
17 > I originally wanted to specify one month but k_f insisted on something
18 > shorter. 2 weeks were the compromise we agreed on. That said, I'd say
19 > weekly 'gpg --refresh' is what we should recommend as the bare minimum.
20 >
21 > That said, the point of two weeks is mostly to give us time to remind
22 > developers that their key is expiring and to give them time to actually
23 > read their mail and do it before it actually expires.
24 Please let's start reminding them BEFORE that. I have seen a lot of
25 .away files over the last decade, and taking a 2-week offline vacation
26 does happen.
27
28 --
29 Robin Hugh Johnson
30 Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer
31 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
32 GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
33 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies