| 1 |
Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> posted 46876A05.30805@g.o, |
| 2 |
excerpted below, on Sun, 01 Jul 2007 11:47:01 +0300: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> +# Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> (01 Jul 2007) |
| 5 |
> +# Upstream describes this as: |
| 6 |
> +# Buggy and unmaintained D-BUS service browser for KDE. |
| 7 |
> +# Seems to segmentation fault on me on startup with current |
| 8 |
> +# dbus. Removal in 30 days unless someone else takes this |
| 9 |
> +# package and fixes the problems. |
| 10 |
> +kde-misc/kdbus |
| 11 |
> + |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
FWIW, it seems to work fine here, no segfaults I could cause just |
| 14 |
browsing tho I didn't try sending any dbus messages with it. ~amd64 (so |
| 15 |
KDE 3.5.7) here except that I've unmasked gcc-4.2.0, and as recommended, |
| 16 |
done the emerge --emptytree thing. So I've got a pretty freshly rebuilt |
| 17 |
system, but it doesn't segfault here, even built with gcc-4.2.0. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
So it can't be /entirely/ borken. I don't use it, and as you're the |
| 20 |
maintainer, if you wish to kill it, I've no objections. Just sayin' it |
| 21 |
/does/ still work, so you'll need a reason other than that, even if it's |
| 22 |
just that you're tired of it and it's not a big loss since KDE-4's coming |
| 23 |
up and it's unmaintained, so would appear to be on borrowed time anyway. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 27 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 28 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives