Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Help offered - Portage tree
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:10:38
Message-Id: 47D9B45F.5090600@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Help offered - Portage tree by davecode@nospammail.net
1 davecode@××××××××××.net kirjoitti:
2 > Well I'm a newcomer to Gentoo and never heard of Sabayon (great project
3 > btw). Knowing no one here or there, nor any history:
4
5 Never heard of and you say it's a great project?
6
7 >
8 > This conversation reminds me of Human Resources. They always have
9 > 'procedures' and 'career tracks.' Gentoo's chitchat about earning gold
10 > stars and brownie points is giving me HR sickness. You're asking
11 > Michael Jordan to prove himself on the high school team.
12 >
13
14 You don't know Sabayon and can evaluate the skills of lxnay?
15
16 >
17 > I've read Gentoo's new dev announcements about monkeys and paper
18 > weights. People with a couple of small open-source projects. The
19 > monkeys and paper weights get CVS rights. Then the chief architect of
20 > Sabayon is scotched over bugzilla output? Please. That smells like bad
21 > fish.
22
23 The new dev announcements are traditionally written in a funky way.
24
25 >
26 > Bugzillas are mostly good for non-devs to report bugs. I know zero
27 > developers who first think to themselves, "ok, I need a project
28 > bugzilla...then I can begin writing code." That isn't how development
29 > works.
30 >
31
32 But I don't know any major project not having a bug reporting tool.
33
34 >
35 > "So you don't have time to file bugs but you would have time to fix
36 > them" is rhetoric. The issue is ROI. Why file bugzillas that some
37 > "dev" authority figure may or may not fix in two years, when you can fix
38 > the code yourself?
39 >
40
41 The perception of things rottening in bugzilla hasn't been proven. Here
42 are the response times to bug filed by lxnay in 2007 and 2008:
43
44 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160333
45 * first response in two days (and marked as WONTFIX but later reopened)
46 * interactions could be better on either sides
47
48 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188024
49 * Fixed in two days
50
51 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192786
52 * Fixed in 7 hours after patch submission
53
54 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193337
55 * Your "expert" is missing basic ebuild knowledge --> WORKSFORME
56 * 9 minutes
57
58 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199886
59 * little under two months (yes this is too long)
60
61 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211324
62 * Been open a couple of weeks waiting for other changes (borderline)
63
64 We do have lots of stuff that rot in bugzilla in many cases they are
65 requests for new ebuilds and not problems with existing ebuilds.
66
67 >
68 > If you want to call him a Gentoo developer, then do so ASAP, and give
69 > him CVS. He knows what he is doing and filing bugzillas is a waste of
70 > talent. If you let him fix his own bugzillas he might go for that.
71 >
72
73 There is nothing stopping him from taking the quizzes as any other new
74 dev. If he is as good say you he is, answering the quizzes won't take long.
75
76 >
77 > You need to attract people like this and if bugzilla isn't working,
78 > think up something new.
79 >
80
81 Bugzilla isn't the only way new people come in.
82
83 >
84 > If you dislike his CVS mods you can always revert, take votes, etc. But
85 > I say +1 let him have at it.
86 >
87
88 Very useful after it has already been synced to tons of machines and
89 users are hitting our IRC channels with torches.
90
91 Regards,
92 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature