1 |
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 03:53 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Partly, the part where it's run by people who have little clue about |
4 |
> ebuild development or QA, who will be taking code from people who have |
5 |
> little clue about ebuild development or QA and giving it to other |
6 |
> people who have little clue about ebuild development or QA. |
7 |
|
8 |
Can you back up the first part? The people running it, you claim, have |
9 |
little clue about ebuild dev and QA -- can you provide proof of this? It |
10 |
does, actually, fall on you, since you're making the accusation. |
11 |
|
12 |
> Partly, the way it's bypassing the normal herd system and allowing |
13 |
> unqualified developers to push code related to things they don't |
14 |
> understand. |
15 |
|
16 |
Where is this code being pushed to, exactly? |
17 |
|
18 |
> Partly, the way it's being pushed through without proper discussion and |
19 |
> without following the proper processes that're used to reduce the risk |
20 |
> of major screwup. |
21 |
|
22 |
This list has been full of discussion. And before the council meeting, |
23 |
there were many further calls for discussion and comment. The sunrise |
24 |
folks have been actually pretty patient about addressing the same |
25 |
concerns over and over and over. |
26 |
|
27 |
> Sunrise is the wrong solution to a misrepresented problem being run by |
28 |
> the wrong people. |
29 |
|
30 |
OK, let's start with: what exactly is the problem? What is the correct |
31 |
way to represent it? After that please explain how you came to see |
32 |
sunrise as the wrong solution to that problem. |
33 |
|
34 |
You've claimed several times that you just try to stick to technical, so |
35 |
please put a stop to the "look, but it's *them* doing it, how can you |
36 |
trust those people?" bullshit already. |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> |
41 |
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |