Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>
To: mcummings@××××××××.net, Greg Oliver <greg@××××.net>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 06:00:26
Message-Id: 002c01c2ae36$45046c60$0101a8c0@cascade
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system .. by Michael Cummings
1 I upgraded world an hour or so ago and it upgraded perl to 5.8. It doesn't
2 appear on hold to me. So far, no ill effects.
3
4 Tom Veldhouse
5
6 ----- Original Message -----
7 From: "Michael Cummings" <mcummings@××××××××.net>
8 To: "Greg Oliver" <greg@××××.net>
9 Cc: <gentoo-dev@g.o>
10 Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:04 PM
11 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..
12
13
14 > It's actually been put back on hold until we can resolve a problem with
15 > the libperl.so (namely that it is always called libperl.so no matter
16 > what version it refers to). If that is fixed appropriately - hopefully
17 > no remerging will be necessary. If you go with the masked build,
18 > emerging will be necessary, which is something we'd rather avoid.
19 >
20 > -Mike
21 >
22 > On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 10:56:56PM -0600, Greg Oliver wrote:
23 > > Will it automatically rebuild all packages that are built against Perl
24 > > 5.6.1 libs when it emerges, or will I have to track them down with a
25 > > script and rebuild them manually?
26 > >
27 > > -Greg
28 > >
29 > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:35:42 -0500
30 > > Michael Cummings <mcummings@××××××××.net> wrote:
31 > >
32 > > > Henti,
33 > > >
34 > > > It's unmasked as of a few hours ago. Give it time to actually
35 > > > hit the mirrors.
36 > > >
37 > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:57:27 +0200
38 > > > Henti Smith <bain@×××××××.za> wrote:
39 > > >
40 > > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:31:28 -0500
41 > > > > Michael Cummings <mcummings@××××××××.net> wrote:
42 > > > >
43 > > > > > Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked
44 > > > > > on any platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are
45 > > > > > running this on a MIPS.
46 > > > > >
47 > > > > > Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86.
48 > > > > >
49 > > > > > Mike - the perl maintainer
50 > > > >
51 > > > > hmmmm ...
52 > > > >
53 > > > >
54 > > > > I had to add ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to et it working ... which is
55 > > > > not something I wanted to do ..
56 > > > >
57 > > > > Henti
58 > > > >
59 > > > > --
60 > > > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
61 > > > >
62 > > >
63 > > >
64 > > > --
65 > > >
66 > > > -----o()o---------------------------------------------
67 > > > | #gentoo-dev on irc.openprojects.net
68 > > > Gentoo Dev | #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net
69 > > > Perl Guy |
70 > > > | GnuPG Key ID: AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
71 > > > -----o()o---------------------------------------------
72 > > >
73 > > >
74 > > > --
75 > > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
76 > > >
77 > >
78 > > --
79 > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
80 >
81 > --
82 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
83 >
84 >
85
86
87
88 --
89 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Duplicates - List Problem [Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..] "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>