1 |
Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
2 |
> All of that said, how about we clear up all of the misinformation about |
3 |
> how arch keywording really works, how deps get wrongly dropped, and then |
4 |
> explain why mips has generally fallen behind. This isn't an excuse, |
5 |
> but is merely a statement of facts which describe the situation. |
6 |
> |
7 |
Thanks for the clear explanation of the process; it helps to put this in |
8 |
context for non-devs. |
9 |
|
10 |
<snip loads of stuff i'm not qualified to comment on> |
11 |
> All of this has gotten us to the current situation, where ebuild |
12 |
> maintainers are really pissed off at the mips team, and where the mips |
13 |
> team is pissed off at ebuild developers for breaking our tree. This is |
14 |
> why I get so mad sometimes. Anyone knows me knows that I have |
15 |
> *consistently* screamed at people for breaking arch deps (rather than |
16 |
> just being an asshole because I'm retiring, as a certain group seems to |
17 |
> think). I would much rather have something that I know has been |
18 |
> tested in the tree, rather than expend unnecessary and unavailable |
19 |
> time to answer to every single security bug. |
20 |
> |
21 |
Um not being rude, but why do you think screaming at people is a good way to |
22 |
work? Personally it switches me right off, and i find it hard not to flip |
23 |
the `bozo bit' on someone who carries on like that. Normally a day or two |
24 |
is sufficient for me to work out why that person was being rude to me (eg |
25 |
on irc ;) or at least what they were trying to say. It has never been |
26 |
enough for me to accept the way they said it mind; I just try to bear in |
27 |
mind that they have issues. |
28 |
|
29 |
> Considering all that I have said above, it was no surprise |
30 |
> that I got a bit irritated by bug #163795. However, I will say that I |
31 |
> merely started out by saying it would have been nice for Diego to |
32 |
> actually attempt to contact one of us on irc for a quick chat before |
33 |
> dropping mips from all of KDE. His notoriously short fuse caused that |
34 |
> discussion to rapidly proceed to all-out flame. |
35 |
> |
36 |
I don't know either of you. What I do know is you called him a very |
37 |
offensive term (and saying someone is like something is just the same imo) |
38 |
and in the context of that discussion you were out of order. Period. |
39 |
|
40 |
TBH I don't care what discussion went on prior- imo ppl should be polite and |
41 |
professional. (If nothing else, it shows a real lack of imagination to |
42 |
resort to cuss-words. ;) In my experience when I've wanted to mouth off |
43 |
(not on gentoo) I've tried to make myself: read, take a break and re-read. |
44 |
Typically by expressing my concerns in better language, I can make my point |
45 |
far more effectively. |
46 |
|
47 |
<snip> Instead of being constructive, |
48 |
> Diego resorted to outright preemptive harassing, which I believe to be a |
49 |
> direct result of sour grapes from bug #163795. |
50 |
> |
51 |
That would be the bug above where you called him a dick? `Sour grapes'?! |
52 |
|
53 |
I don't want to get into the whys and wherefores. I'd just like to say to |
54 |
all devs: PLEASE BE POLITE. It doesn't cost you anything except thinking |
55 |
time which will make your case _better_. |
56 |
|
57 |
> I know it's hard for |
58 |
> those of you who believe that Diego's shit smells like roses, but he |
59 |
> was harassing an arch developer who was only trying to do his job |
60 |
> correctly. I took exception, so I screamed at Diego as I have many |
61 |
> other people during my time in Gentoo (yes, shocking as it may be, I |
62 |
> have called people twats and fuckheads without them quitting as a |
63 |
> result). |
64 |
> |
65 |
And frankly that's just bad form. The fact that ppl stuck around doesn't say |
66 |
one iota about you or your methods; it speaks far more to their motivation. |
67 |
And let's face it- we all love gentoo. Or why would ciaran and you still be |
68 |
posting to bugs and dev-ml? Why not just fork off? |
69 |
|
70 |
> Apparently that was just too much for him, so not only did he |
71 |
> quit, but he attempted to blackmail devrel into firing me instantly. |
72 |
> Perhaps, I should have been slightly less blunt with him, but I stand |
73 |
> by my comments. I do not feel I was wrong to tell him off for |
74 |
> harassing eroyf. |
75 |
> |
76 |
Ah but that's not what you did, is it? |
77 |
|
78 |
If you are seriously taking the position that you stand by your rude, |
79 |
unprofessional manner then TBH I'm glad you're retiring, for gentoo's sake. |
80 |
And while I understand kloeri's statements on the blog, I don't get why |
81 |
you've gotten away with calling people "twats and fuckheads." I can only |
82 |
put it down to devrel overwork. |
83 |
|
84 |
> Now this is just my opinion and not fact, but Diego |
85 |
> was merely looking for an excuse to quit, so don't blame me. I didn't |
86 |
> force him to quit, he did that of his own free will. Anyone who knows |
87 |
> Diego knows that he has been talking of quitting for a long time now. |
88 |
> If not me, he would surely have found another excuse, but whatever. |
89 |
> What is done is done. I indeed have retired, so those of you who are |
90 |
> so upset and offended that I am still around can sleep a little easier |
91 |
> at night knowing that Satan^H^H^H^H^HGeoman won't be screaming at you |
92 |
> for doing stupid things any longer. |
93 |
> |
94 |
Frankly I value your and ciaranm's input *when you are polite* but the rest |
95 |
of the time it just leaves a bad feeling in my mouth, even tho it's nothing |
96 |
to do with me. It makes me feel really uncomfortable about associating with |
97 |
gentoo. Flameeyes never did that. |
98 |
|
99 |
Before you go- were you working on EAPI? I've been waiting ages on that.. |
100 |
|
101 |
http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct |
102 |
http://alec.scriptkitty.com/blog/2007/01/07/working-as-a-team-criticism-and-respect/ |
103 |
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/01/msg00101.html |
104 |
|
105 |
|
106 |
-- |
107 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |