1 |
Not sure I need /etc/init.d to be touched once I have it working because |
2 |
I sometimes make minor alterations to files in there that I'd rather not |
3 |
get clobbered. One thing that frustrated me, tho, was the difficulty in |
4 |
checking the differences in the new files in /etc. I may actually get up |
5 |
the ambition to write a script to do a batch diff on all the files in |
6 |
the various /etc directories. |
7 |
|
8 |
One thing that did frustrate me while I was looking at the changes |
9 |
manually was that some files showed very minor diffs. /etc/pwdb.conf |
10 |
showed alterations on all the lines. Some of them, to my recollection |
11 |
had the ordering changed and perhaps some spacing that was different. It |
12 |
might also be useful to know why the changes were made so I can make a |
13 |
determination as to whether I merge the changes in or not. Or was there |
14 |
an emerge command for some of this? |
15 |
|
16 |
Ric |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 12:48, Yannick Koehler wrote: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Guys, |
22 |
> |
23 |
> not sure for anyone else but is init.d really need to be protected? I |
24 |
> mean does someone really change files in that directory (other than |
25 |
> adding or removing)? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> That dir should always get merged. It would also get really nice of the |
28 |
> portage could detect that no changes has been made to the file since its |
29 |
> installation and therefore merge it without any issues. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Like if the protected config file's time were saved in a temp files that |
32 |
> portage would look into before merging to see if the date has or not |
33 |
> change since the last install. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Yannick Koehler |
36 |
> |