From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] gnuconfig.eclass: use BDEPEND, BROOT where available (drop support for EAPI <4) | ||
Date: | Wed, 07 Apr 2021 11:31:14 | ||
Message-Id: | u5z0y72mk@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] gnuconfig.eclass: use BDEPEND, BROOT where available (drop support for EAPI <4) by Michael Orlitzky |
1 | >>>>> On Wed, 07 Apr 2021, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > 5) There are no clear rules about what @system packages can be left |
4 | > out of *DEPEND and when, so their presence is wildly inconsistent. |
5 | |
6 | The rules are pretty clear for BDEPEND and bootstrap packages, which is |
7 | what we're talking about here. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |