| 1 |
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 23:13 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 17:00:24 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 11:46 +0000, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > commit: d866d4705e1e4a092579a31df2815e3407950a19 |
| 7 |
> > > Author: Jeroen Roovers <jer <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
| 8 |
> > > AuthorDate: Mon Oct 1 11:45:43 2018 +0000 |
| 9 |
> > > Commit: Jeroen Roovers <jer <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
| 10 |
> > > CommitDate: Mon Oct 1 11:46:10 2018 +0000 |
| 11 |
> > > URL: |
| 12 |
> > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=d866d470 |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > net-libs/libssh2: Add USE=mbedtls, switch to cmake for building |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > > * Add support for net-libs/mbedtls |
| 17 |
> > > * Switch to cmake as the autotools build is even more broken |
| 18 |
> > > * Remove USE=static-libs as that inhibits building shared libs |
| 19 |
> > > * Use REQUIRED_USE to force choosing a crypto backend |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> You completely skipped over the improvements. In effect, you show |
| 22 |
> yourself to be completely unresponsive to what were considered positive |
| 23 |
> changes to the author of the work. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Then you begin to pick apart what you think is wrong. It's not obvious |
| 26 |
> why you are doing it this way, and with regard to practically all |
| 27 |
> of your earlier e-mails addressed to me, I can only assume malice. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I'm sorry but I'm not going to help you if you keep attacking me like |
| 30 |
this. I have merely pointed out mistakes I've noticed. I did it |
| 31 |
privately specifically with respect to you. You turn this into some |
| 32 |
kind of public slandering effort, apparently for no other reason than |
| 33 |
'assuming malice'. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I'm sorry if you can't see anything good in people. When someone points |
| 36 |
out an issue with my ebuild, I assume he just wants to have the ebuild |
| 37 |
improved. But now I learn people do that out of sheer malice. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
I'm sorry that my comments were not detailed enough. I have wrongly |
| 40 |
assumed they'd point you in the right direction, and you'd be able to |
| 41 |
solve those issues with help of eclass documentation. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
> Someone suggested in an e-mail that "he is just annoyed that you broke |
| 44 |
> an ebuild that he has spent some time maintaining", but `git shortlog |
| 45 |
> -- .` would tell you quite a different story. What I think is happening |
| 46 |
> here is that you think I am "touching your stuff". You have to nitpick |
| 47 |
> at it instead of just fixing it together and then sending me an update |
| 48 |
> about the extra work or by pointing out the problems in a more humane |
| 49 |
> way and leaving me to fix them. |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
That's one way to look at it. The other way is that you're so horribly |
| 52 |
abrasive that I'm *scared* to touch this ebuild beyond what needs to be |
| 53 |
absolutely done. That's why I didn't switch it to CMake earlier -- |
| 54 |
because I presumed you'd attack me again. It seems I wasn't wrong after |
| 55 |
all. |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-- |
| 58 |
Best regards, |
| 59 |
Michał Górny |
Archives