| 1 |
On 28/02/14 17:24, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 02/28/2014 08:28 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from an |
| 4 |
>> ebuild, if user hasn't |
| 5 |
>> set otherwise. |
| 6 |
>> So it could be configured like USE_ORDER which is |
| 7 |
>> "env:pkg:conf:defaults:pkginternal:repo:env.d" |
| 8 |
>> So INSTALL_MASK_ORDER like "ebuild:${user's own INSTALL_MASK}" |
| 9 |
>> This would be very helpful in preventing people from shooting themself |
| 10 |
>> in the foot |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> The only problem is that I propably don't have enough python skills to |
| 13 |
>> make that happen w/ |
| 14 |
>> sys-apps/portage. But does the suggestion make sense? Should I open a |
| 15 |
>> feature request bug? |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
> What would be the purpose? Can you give me a use case. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I already did, earlier in this thread. Please refer to it. |
Archives