Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?

[Donnie Berkholz]

Mike Owen wrote:
> From this user's perspective, simple is better. qt3 and qt4 as use
> flags are completely and utterly obvious as to what they mean, and
> there is no confusion about them. Adding a plain qt flag in there
> brings back the gtk/gtk2 mess that we've presumably been trying to
> avoid in the future.

That depends on how it's done. If it's done in a simple and obvious way
(USE=qt means use the best available qt, USE=qt# for other weird stuff
that most people don't care about and so can ignore), it shouldn't be
that bad.

Thanks,
Donnie