1 |
20.08.2013 23:48, Tom Wijsman пишет: |
2 |
> Yes, +1; last time this came up on chat, I asked whether it would be a |
3 |
> nice idea to have something between stable and ~, what you propose |
4 |
> sounds similar and might make sense. Though, on the other hand, doing |
5 |
> it this way we don't get the advantages that filing bugs give; if we |
6 |
> do it this way, I'd assume we need some other implementation to |
7 |
> cover that (for things like the "depends on", "blocks", ... fields)... |
8 |
|
9 |
Why we should bring new half-stable, half-testing keyword for this? I |
10 |
think that this is no way to go. We should improve current situation |
11 |
with arches by some other ways(e.g., recruiting people). Maybe drop some |
12 |
damn-bad understaffed arches to unstable only(i do not point finger on |
13 |
anyone, they know, who they are... :-)) |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
17 |
Gentoo developer |
18 |
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead |
19 |
Gentoo Qt project lead |
20 |
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead |