| 1 |
Looking also to changes proposed in GLEP 72 maybe my previous suggestion |
| 2 |
would bring another profile status as unattended or ceased. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
This would allow the transition for those that need to use old or |
| 5 |
archived profile versions. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On 2020-04-10 12:31, Samuel Bernardo wrote: |
| 8 |
> Hi everyone, |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I would like to leave a suggestion for Gentoo portage ebuild review. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Since there are some ebuilds in portage that become outdated for more |
| 13 |
> than one year when there are new versions available, maybe could be |
| 14 |
> possible to add a new step in Gentoo QA service to generate an alarm |
| 15 |
> (send email to project and CI leaders) to request a human review. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Two conditions could be verified: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> - if ebuild don't receive any review for more than a time period defined |
| 20 |
> by project leader (threshold set by CI) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> - if there is more then X new versions in upstream, get from a release |
| 23 |
> feed associated with ebuild (X value defined by project leader with |
| 24 |
> threshold set by CI) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Best, |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Samuel |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
Archives