| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 07/27/2012 02:51 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:44:47 -0400 |
| 6 |
> "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" <zerochaos@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> I would REALLY like to cut down on things like what I saw when I |
| 9 |
>> upgraded today: |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> * Messages for package |
| 12 |
>> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-20120520: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> You are looking for QA_FLAGS_IGNORED. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
I am more than aware of how the ebuilds could be fixed, my point was, |
| 17 |
did the commiter ignore the warnings? Most likely not, most likely the |
| 18 |
commiter didn't realize there was an issue because this isn't checked by |
| 19 |
default, and it should be. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
So, can we add what is necessary for this to work to the dev profile *FLAGS? |
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQEjxhAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKwncP/izAfDaUMUhHqfKO/29GWTgt |
| 27 |
9Lfs7h4gdU5BYCjluOsSSEOrDb0iMjKShkl63b5PGMFZ1FifSx3LAiYymAXeGmAD |
| 28 |
bs+F3PLv/jkFpXjs7aRbtHo+wtl0IKGpydc9UqsttJ3357w678KCa1eQDpfaME6P |
| 29 |
TDgouiZwrVYf0SPSO+F578uqp4Bf4sBaAb6VjZd2m9BbNk9VM67H9yjmTQa2ZK6U |
| 30 |
SynIX4hltESAdX59rsRAZwjmELxxSYlo27MPdDaqIyTa0kRe8SnqlUa8wR9DwD24 |
| 31 |
di/Ho/969moLXTqA/A7x0+uN1jX5dPQErwyvNUmpP4WAH0iybthKQwr/leyEi8Fn |
| 32 |
sLDXTw0PzqcMnxsK1Vl6CqnAaOtHQMmPhPT7Lo84c3kv2yQkljuRlDdH9O2HvVTO |
| 33 |
bmEVFekSPoPH/HXEDS8wha3Bzj+t5rwXhYDcL2l0S6Bsl2BpLKRrtG5UJWTP6/Oo |
| 34 |
fcNuFPvo3lmuL0dVc/oWswE0dkZHdIkqCTEl4ezyuBlSBPfxpVpV318DySz7QtEN |
| 35 |
ilrpBsEe6TKZgstRH2DCq4X97BM5WkLRvjQfmYnk/EybYNsTmstAtG3IeEr1Xesh |
| 36 |
SugoX67/mwQg4Dz4AlePbC8cDkHGx6/8e1TSrdP2Ja0sk/n6qP2dderjJS/1mCON |
| 37 |
PC0OIOW9td5RrbCVvFZO |
| 38 |
=Sb2H |
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives