| 1 |
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 13:43 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:26:16 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > OK, would you let me to create a tracker bug for eapi5 accepted item? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> No. We're working on the PMS list. We don't need yet another place to |
| 7 |
> look. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> > About suggesting new item (like forcing rebuilding of other packages |
| 10 |
> > as discussed some days ago and crosscompile support suggested by Tommy |
| 11 |
> > today), I guess we need to get them voted by the council? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> No. You need to get a draft diff for PMS written, along with an |
| 14 |
> implementation in a package mangler of your choice and proof that it |
| 15 |
> works in practice. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Umm, this way to work makes any suggestion for future eapis to be |
| 19 |
accepted only if they come from people able to prepare that |
| 20 |
implementation in the package manager their prefer and, then, be stalled |
| 21 |
more and more time :| |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> The plan is we'll present the EAPI 5 branch to the Council and have |
| 24 |
> them vote on each individual feature. Then we'll cherry-pick the ones |
| 25 |
> they approve to master. |
| 26 |
> |
Archives