1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 04/25/2011 09:55 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
5 |
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Dane Smith <c1pher@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
>> @Trustees: Any thoughts? I didn't mean to step on any toes, I just |
7 |
>> hadn't spotted that old bug until today. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> So, speaking only for myself, my thinking is that there is enough |
10 |
> debate over the truecrypt license that I see no point in not just |
11 |
> playing it safe and restricting mirroring. Restricting mirroring will |
12 |
> make Gentoo itself not a party to any redistribution (at least not a |
13 |
> direct party). If we further restrict fetching you could argue that |
14 |
> we're getting ourselves out of the facilitation business as well (not |
15 |
> a legal theory I'm enamored with). |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I'd like to propose that devs should not commit ebuilds that do not |
18 |
> have mirroring restrictions unless the license is in |
19 |
> @BINARY-REDISTRIBUTABLE. Perhaps this should be a repoman check. |
20 |
> Whether something ends up in that group is more complicated, but |
21 |
> repoman doesn't need to worry about that. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Neither Debian nor Ubuntu redistribute TrueCrypt. That at the very |
24 |
> least should give us concern with doing so. Their license is also not |
25 |
> considered free by any of the usual bodies. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Sure, it is a little hassle for users, but not that much in the big |
28 |
> scheme of things - especially since other distros don't package it at |
29 |
> all. Better to let any lawyers we retain focus on getting the |
30 |
> foundation in better order and not have them fighting over licenses. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Rich |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
These are all good enough reasons for me. Re-Restricted mirror and fetch |
36 |
in CVS. Thanks =) |
37 |
|
38 |
- -- |
39 |
Dane Smith (c1pher) |
40 |
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86 |
41 |
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531&op=index |
42 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
43 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
44 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
45 |
|
46 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNtYFaAAoJEEsurZwMLhUxRpYP/0+HhQLjdy9jA9WGr9rHxwyU |
47 |
lH4l1+EZLjYt4/9e7Qfiprln9kX/f/bMLQrExlLv7cgwimKOlDXIeg0SNdHGFc26 |
48 |
01WGyEXUy+6cVrIxrp4CwVrYUC/6idGf6NrQ3UdEM7pStvFWzQE1z7UGNSzeAHK5 |
49 |
OktqXEERY/gYgzT/yzMusyXF9w+Pn9eRmRrDE2tIFbFDboG1eWTojl6xkSGBZIxT |
50 |
/dfN3zpiGwgLsMeuvFZTLNpC4DthgfL+YakdOxKtnLYfSg5Hw6GmA9vO35pfDYJX |
51 |
mocu7t67FqSz03A626CvuwzL5dyreUwfGtQZXTqndMSZX34ufgXXjVR0JnJIZQop |
52 |
k01/5d0jGHmwI4+n37pQM3MnyuX8biNCTnoUez1dqoh/LTeFr3BFAqBGas2IYHHa |
53 |
+UG22OoZL0JY4gP3dof83moFpI5k33dY+cZX2cnufiqKsboJy6oDjsFcrseLtKpG |
54 |
aOKn56yMUUksIh0ef/P2ZtJ0CYO7W2L1zFU5Wb7E9BREy1Q1blW7WQC10ENjzzKs |
55 |
exIuGi+jI7uRGb90xOiV/a86I3LC0pOeOVEFhxOizUWNEjD0plihAvEjmxYgdYm6 |
56 |
yA/vYbQaYiIPuR+1URnTyB52w/QBcf2EMUlStmE10w755VDn2FilqZk5hkYLQ/0J |
57 |
Jd+JEl7OmfSvnUkkQ5tE |
58 |
=emar |
59 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |