Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support | ||
| Date: | Tue, 26 May 2009 13:20:58 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20090526142048.5c2695fe@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support by lxnay@sabayonlinux.org | ||
| 1 | On Tue, 26 May 2009 10:13:51 +0200 (CEST) |
| 2 | lxnay@××××××××××××.org wrote: |
| 3 | > So, "::" vs "@" apart, is it something that is worth looking and |
| 4 | > implementing in future EAPIs? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Isn't it just a user issue, not one we want used anywhere where EAPI |
| 7 | rules are in effect? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> |