Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:27:06
Message-Id: 4BAE15A6.80101@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch by "Petteri Räty"
1 On 03/12/2010 09:18 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
2 > There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
3 > bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
4 > question but there's a difference of opinion here:
5 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272160#c5
6 > Let's get agreed on a single approach and I will add a note here:
7 > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html
8 > I naturally support the approach I have been doing as I think the arch
9 > team is the one in charge.
10 >
11 > Regards,
12 > Petteri
13 >
14
15 So let's summarize for assigning to the single arch:
16
17 Against (and my comments on why they don't apply):
18 - Comments would only go to arch team after resolving:
19 * maintainer is still in Cc or Reporter
20 - Arch teams not in charge of fixing problems
21 * If problems come up they deserve a new bug as a dependency
22 * one bug per issue and a stabilization bug is about stabilization
23 - Maintainer being able to decide when to go stable
24 * Bug wranglers should still assign to maintainers for their ack
25 * The maintainer assigns it to the arch team
26
27 In support (and my comments in support):
28 - Can be used as a gentle reminder for slacker arches
29 - The arch teams are actually ones doing the work to resolve the bug
30 * As they are the ones to mark it as resolved it makes sense for them
31 to be the assignees
32
33 So based on this I propose that I will write this down in appropriate
34 places in to our documentation and commit a week from now. Please object
35 if you don't agree and we can discuss some more.
36
37 Regards,
38 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies