| 1 |
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:45:14PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:19:45PM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> El 16/05/11 19:54, Kacper Kowalik escribió: |
| 5 |
> >> > Neither of those points include sending mail to gentoo-dev, which tend |
| 6 |
> >> > to quickly convert into the "witch hunt" and seldom lead to anything |
| 7 |
> >> > conclusive. |
| 8 |
> >> To some of us (i.e. me as a staffer and probably any wanna be developer |
| 9 |
> >> following the list) it is a good way to learn from others' mistake |
| 10 |
> >> before applying for full developership. |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > This may be a bit of surprise to you but this is not an educational |
| 14 |
> > list. If you people disagree with these kind of commits feel free to |
| 15 |
> > open a bug to QA/Devrel like the policy suggests. But pretty please |
| 16 |
> > try to break this non-sense loop of this and similar threads. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I actually value times when this stuff is CC'd to the list, is there |
| 19 |
> some other list you think folks should CC problems on? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > Regards, |
| 23 |
> > -- |
| 24 |
> > Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
This problem is not a technical one to justify discussion on gentoo-dev |
| 28 |
list. This is clearly a disagreement over the established policies which |
| 29 |
should go through QA and/or Devrel if someone feels like it worths |
| 30 |
pushing it so far. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Regards, |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
Archives