1 |
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:21:35 -0500 |
2 |
Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I personally feel that it may be a good time to reconsider making |
5 |
> gentoo-core a publicly read-only list. Several users I know (some |
6 |
> personally) are irate that we appear to be a "behind-closed-doors" |
7 |
> project. Yes, this stems from the recent fork announcement. |
8 |
|
9 |
Actually I somehow doubt that most of the people who cry really loud at |
10 |
the moment would even bother to read -core if it was made read-only. |
11 |
|
12 |
> I hope that we can open -core as a publicly read-only list to involve |
13 |
> our community more. We owe this much to our user-base in my opinion. |
14 |
> For these reasons, I have CC'd this to -dev. |
15 |
|
16 |
Up until now I've always been in favor of making -core world readable. |
17 |
But after the proposal of the new managment structure I think that |
18 |
publicly available summaries of the last week (which the project leaders |
19 |
have to do as far as my understanding goes) are enough (considered they |
20 |
are not to briefly), as they give us users willing to help an indication |
21 |
what is going on, what already has been discussed, why it has (not) been |
22 |
dismissed etc., while still assuring devs have the privacy they |
23 |
sometimes need. |
24 |
|
25 |
Also I think that a read-only -core will increase the noise ratio on |
26 |
-dev again, as some people may want to immediately react when a |
27 |
proposal is made they don't like, and I'll bet that -dev will be the |
28 |
place where this mails go. So I suspect we'll end up with a number of |
29 |
postings to -dev which would have never been necessary because the dev |
30 |
team votes against this proposal in the end. This kind of situation can |
31 |
be avoided by a weekly status update. |
32 |
|
33 |
So personally, I _really_ want to know _some of the things_ discussed |
34 |
on -core, but I'm not really assured that a publicly available -core is |
35 |
the best solution. |
36 |
|
37 |
Michael |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
www.cargal.org |
41 |
GnuPG-key-ID: 0x90CA09E3 |
42 |
Jabber-ID: citizen428 [at] cargal [dot] org |
43 |
Registered Linux User #278726 |