Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] more broken depednencies
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 02:13:33
Message-Id: 200312272023.01379.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] more broken depednencies by Spider
1 On Saturday 27 December 2003 19:24, Spider wrote:
2 > Oh yes! even more.
3 >
4 > Can people who feel like it take a look for all builds that contain the
5 > word "newdepend" and think at least twice? remember.. newdepend means
6 > that RDEPEND won't be set (unless you do newrdepend) which means that
7 > the package will be broken in GRP situations.
8 >
9 > (Yep, its a known fact that all of KDE is broken and unless fixed
10 > cannot be reliably distributed on our next release.)
11
12 the newXdepend's should only be used in eclasses
13 -mike

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] more broken depednencies Spider <spider@g.o>