Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Lost Logic <lostlogic@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] VMWare and GCC 3.1
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 09:49:26
Message-Id: 20020605094925.A26913@lostlogicx.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] VMWare and GCC 3.1 by Niek van der Maas
1 Better to try Lars Pechan's work around for now... he's done some great
2 research on the subject;-)
3
4 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Previous Message(s)-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
5 > Hi,
6 >
7 > There are several problems with binaries compiled with gcc 2.95, like the
8 > nVidia-drivers, StartOffice, OO, etc. You can solve these problems by
9 > patching glibc. Look here:
10 > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2002-02/msg00152.html for the patch.
11 > More information can be found in this topic:
12 > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=3963
13 >
14 > Bye,
15 >
16 > Niek.
17 >
18 > On Tuesday 04 June 2002 14:35, Prashanth Aditya Susarla wrote:
19 > > VMWare's acting smart with gcc-3.1. Fire up vmware and this is what you
20 > > get:-
21 > > /opt/vmware/bin/vmware: relocation error: /opt/vmware/bin/vmware:
22 > > undefined symbol: __udivdi3
23 > >
24 > > There's no known bug about vmware on bugs.gentoo.org (guess there was no
25 > > reason to be until gcc-3.x). Looking at the error it's similar to what one
26 > > got before the nvidia-glx workaround. So there could be some LD_PRELOADing
27 > > to do to perhaps get vmware to work.
28 > >
29 > > Regards,
30 > > Prashanth Aditya Susarla
31 > >
32 > > _______________________________________________
33 > > gentoo-dev mailing list
34 > > gentoo-dev@g.o
35 > > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
36 >
37 > _______________________________________________
38 > gentoo-dev mailing list
39 > gentoo-dev@g.o
40 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] VMWare and GCC 3.1 Bart Verwilst <verwilst@g.o>