1 |
Better to try Lars Pechan's work around for now... he's done some great |
2 |
research on the subject;-) |
3 |
|
4 |
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Previous Message(s)-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- |
5 |
> Hi, |
6 |
> |
7 |
> There are several problems with binaries compiled with gcc 2.95, like the |
8 |
> nVidia-drivers, StartOffice, OO, etc. You can solve these problems by |
9 |
> patching glibc. Look here: |
10 |
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2002-02/msg00152.html for the patch. |
11 |
> More information can be found in this topic: |
12 |
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=3963 |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Bye, |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Niek. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> On Tuesday 04 June 2002 14:35, Prashanth Aditya Susarla wrote: |
19 |
> > VMWare's acting smart with gcc-3.1. Fire up vmware and this is what you |
20 |
> > get:- |
21 |
> > /opt/vmware/bin/vmware: relocation error: /opt/vmware/bin/vmware: |
22 |
> > undefined symbol: __udivdi3 |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > There's no known bug about vmware on bugs.gentoo.org (guess there was no |
25 |
> > reason to be until gcc-3.x). Looking at the error it's similar to what one |
26 |
> > got before the nvidia-glx workaround. So there could be some LD_PRELOADing |
27 |
> > to do to perhaps get vmware to work. |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > Regards, |
30 |
> > Prashanth Aditya Susarla |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > _______________________________________________ |
33 |
> > gentoo-dev mailing list |
34 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o |
35 |
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
36 |
> |
37 |
> _______________________________________________ |
38 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
39 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
40 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |