| 1 |
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:46:18 +0400 |
| 2 |
Igor <lanthruster@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> And one more goal - without PortageQOS you're forever stuck with |
| 4 |
> the legacy portage design. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> If the team ever decides to change Portage you'll need feedback |
| 7 |
> on how the new portage works to patch it quickly in case there are |
| 8 |
> troubles. It's too risky to touch portage right now. Everyone |
| 9 |
> understands that this is a kamikaze job. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Uh, no. We already know lots of things that are wrong with the Portage |
| 12 |
design. We also know how to fix those things. Neither of those is the |
| 13 |
sticking point. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives