Archives
Archives
| From: | Alexander Futasz <acid.punk@×××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem | ||
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:23:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20040624102820.16e87a85.acid.punk@gmx.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem by foser |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:45:28 +0200, foser wrote: |
| 2 | > 'maintainer arch' + stable state of the ebuild on the 'maintainers |
| 3 | > arch' is the indication of stability |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Hahaha. Because software seems to run stable on one architecture doesn't |
| 6 | necessarily mean it is stable on another architecture. It of course |
| 7 | needs to be tested thouroughly on every architecture. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |