1 |
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:29:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
2 |
> On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
3 |
> > El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió: |
4 |
> >> On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
5 |
> >>> El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: |
6 |
> >>>> Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 13:56:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos: |
7 |
> >>>> |
8 |
> >>>>> I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide |
9 |
> >>>>> to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I remember |
10 |
> >>>>> their action was needed for the move to testing of some arches and the |
11 |
> >>>>> "package-by-package" proposal for others) |
12 |
> >>>>> |
13 |
> >>>>> Also, I am not sure if any other arch teams (sparc, ia64?) would want to |
14 |
> >>>>> get this policy too :| (I got ppc* because this concrete case ;)) |
15 |
> >>>> At first this is an arch team decision. No need for the council. |
16 |
> >>>> |
17 |
> >>>> (Given that in this case there is a responsive and addressable arch team...) |
18 |
> >>>> |
19 |
> >>>> -- |
20 |
> >>>> |
21 |
> >>>> Andreas K. Huettel |
22 |
> >>>> Gentoo Linux developer |
23 |
> >>>> dilfridge@g.o |
24 |
> >>>> http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
25 |
> >>>> |
26 |
> >>> The problem is that blueness looks to be the only member currently |
27 |
> >>> replying :/, I have checked their page and I see no team lead or |
28 |
> >>> similar. Then, I am not sure how to get the ok to proceed or not :| (to |
29 |
> >>> prevent this from getting stalled and we keep trying stabilizing all the |
30 |
> >>> things). |
31 |
> >>> |
32 |
> >>> I remember from older thread (one related with udev stabilization), that |
33 |
> >>> blueness was also the only one replying. |
34 |
> >>> |
35 |
> >>> |
36 |
> >> Yeah, not having a clear lead is a problem. No one wants to just make a |
37 |
> >> big decision on behalf of the team without making sure everyone is on |
38 |
> >> board. Pacho, do you have access to timberdoodle? If so, join both |
39 |
> >> teams and just take the initiative and let any other "claimants" step |
40 |
> >> forward now. BTW, taking the lead doesn't mean doing all the work |
41 |
> >> yourself. I want to see ppc/ppc64 in good shape. I'll be happy to |
42 |
> >> write scripts to do the demoting to ~ etc etc. |
43 |
> >> |
44 |
> > I don't even know about timberdoodle :( |
45 |
> > |
46 |
> > I forwarded the mail to both alias (as I forgot first time), then, |
47 |
> > hopefully they will review it :/ |
48 |
> > |
49 |
> > Will CC them again to this just now with this link to allow all to read |
50 |
> > the full thread: |
51 |
> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92151 |
52 |
> > |
53 |
> > |
54 |
> > |
55 |
> |
56 |
> I think its clear who cares about ppc/ppc64. If there are no |
57 |
> objections, I'll take the lead of those teams and see this plan |
58 |
> through. I'll wait a few days for people to voice concerns. Then I'll |
59 |
> start by generating a list of all stable and testing packages on ppc and |
60 |
> ppc64. I'll post then and then continue the conversation on just the |
61 |
> ppc and ppc64 lists. Don't worry, I won't start dropping to ~ until we |
62 |
> have a concise plan and we're all on board. |
63 |
|
64 |
I don't think you can/should just take over the leadership of an arch. |
65 |
Why not have meeting/discussion for team members. Especially since you |
66 |
are proposing such a big change. |
67 |
|
68 |
|
69 |
Thanks, |
70 |
|
71 |
-- |
72 |
Jack Morgan |
73 |
Pub 4096R/761D8E0A 2010-09-13 Jack Morgan <jmorgan@g.o>> |
74 |
Fingerprint = DD42 EA48 D701 D520 C2CD 55BE BF53 C69B 761D 8E0A |