Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Daniel Goller <morfic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Making the developer community more open
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:35:57
Message-Id: 1142980337.17650.64.camel@localhost64.wan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Making the developer community more open by Simon Stelling
1 On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 13:09 +0100, Simon Stelling wrote:
2 > Bret Towe wrote:
3 > > perhaps having some proxys of a sort that accept patchs and such
4 > > from trusted users that would commit fixes to portage would help.
5 > > similiar to the kernel format that way users can 'commit'/help out quickly
6 > > without having to go thru the long process of becoming a dev
7 >
8 > Users can (and do) attach patches to any bug in bugzilla. When applying
9 > such patches, the committing dev hopefully checks the patch and makes
10 > sure it's clean, so he already is the kind of proxy you are asking for.
11 >
12 > --
13
14 maybe he more means having a "working relationship" with people rather
15 than sending them to attach patches to bugzilla. make it more personal
16 than clinical
17 circumventing the requirement for an AT position, a casual "i give you
18 patches as i come across problems on my box, can you take care of them"
19 relationship for people who can and will contribute occasionally, w/o
20 the time to take on a dev position w/o commit access (aka Arch Tester)
21 like the people you hang out with on irc even, the ones that help other
22 users, or the kind you see active on forums, take their occational
23 patch/ebuild
24 like less red tape, more acceptance of the occasional contribution
25
26 how about that as "proxy"?
27
28 Daniel
29
30 > Kind Regards,
31 >
32 > Simon Stelling
33 > Gentoo/AMD64 Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature