Archives
Archives
| From: | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: location of portage tree | ||
| Date: | Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:07:06 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAATnKFASgk1asn-6FdSKF-o3uZna=qShkPxqEwmmXVmwvnrdxw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: location of portage tree by Alec Warner |
||
| 1 | On 28 March 2012 08:47, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > The gentoo-x86 ebuild tree is not necessarily portage related. |
| 3 | > However I think we should paint the bike shed '/srv/tree' |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I for one never developed any love for /srv , its always seemed like |
| 6 | an unwanted bit of poo left behind by an unloved gremlin. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Kent |
| 12 | |
| 13 | perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, |
| 14 | 3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" |