Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 07:09:24
Message-Id: eda42536-8cce-f389-6ffd-05a5bcfae4c1@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] The changes about the stabilization process by Andrew Savchenko
1 On 04/01/17 12:57, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
2 > Hi all,
3 >
4 > On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 22:55:27 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
5 > [...]
6 >> Another question: do we steel need to set STABLEREQ keyword for
7 >> stabilization bugs? Since we now have a dedicated Stabilization
8 >> component, STABLEREQ looks redundant.
9 >
10 > Ping here.
11 >
12 > Best regards,
13 > Andrew Savchenko
14 >
15
16 With the changes, STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ indeed become redundant.
17
18 That said, it's entirely possible some arch team members are relying on
19 these keywords for old saved searches etc. With so many people working
20 in isolation, it's difficult to know who is doing what.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>