Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage-2.0.51 STABLE TESTING
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:19:39
Message-Id: 200410202121.42464.jstubbs@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage-2.0.51 STABLE TESTING by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Wednesday 20 October 2004 14:14, Duncan wrote:
2 > The problem concisely is this: Certain binary packages say they are
3 > corrupt and refuse to install, altho the tbz2 seems to be fine as does the
4 > ebuild tacked onto the end. It's whatever other data is there that
5 > portage seems to be calling corrupt.
6
7 Try running the following on one of those broken packages. The command should
8 be on one line and bash...tbz2 should of course be replaced.
9
10 python -c 'import xpak; tbz2=xpak.tbz2("bash-3.0-r5.tbz2"); print
11 tbz2.getelements("CATEGORY")'
12
13 If it's empty, that's the problem. I had a lot of trouble following your
14 previous email. Would you be able to list step-by-step how to reproduce the
15 problem?
16
17 Regards,
18 Jason Stubbs
19
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Portage-2.0.51 STABLE TESTING Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>