Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <kristian.fiskerstrand@××××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>, James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] old "masked for testing" entries
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 21:57:33
Message-Id: 53B1DD21.5020406@sumptuouscapital.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] old "masked for testing" entries by James Cloos
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 06/30/2014 11:40 PM, James Cloos wrote:
5 >>>>>> "MG" == Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> writes:
6 >
7
8
9 > I've read that some heavy users of db, such as sks, work better
10 > with 5.3 than they did with older versions. But upgrading needs to
11 > be done with care.
12 >
13
14 I'm not familiar with any large difference. I'm testing with 5.2 for
15 my live SKS ebuild which I've been using for quite some time on a few
16 of my servers as backends of the load-balanced without any issues,
17 I've not tried 5.3 yet. The net-misc/sks package for ~arch is still on
18 4.8 without any issues on the rest of the servers. Upgrading is
19 relatively easy, mostly involving cleaning the environment, which will
20 be re-generated with the updated version.
21
22 - --
23 - ----------------------------
24 Kristian Fiskerstrand
25 Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
26 Twitter: @krifisk
27 - ----------------------------
28 Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
29 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
30 - ----------------------------
31 Nomina stultorum scribuntur ubique locorum
32 Fools have the habit of writing their names everywhere
33 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
34
35 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTsd0hAAoJEPw7F94F4TagCmsP/0fNyRcCDgpEpscr2nM3gAnC
36 ccO8vmB44lAXNh4Zq01hb334vBl+qDT7fJDQDt/Jb39NKA/2zMQskKzVkDa1vnaj
37 4YHE7pfx128GtAuUCWZgKipkMUG1hKEuL3GZL2KaaoJ/zk6JYLW/z2ZZuo99N7JI
38 ks0ltdIwPNTmj8YVxFQKqo9Nbb9yrrMNYGfxPmFQdSRr5ZkM+ieOihkh95ICTz5C
39 qfyn2eh85mVPS+aMN8MzuQQLE5hMauQ+YohiZ3Q4NIx0hdjTesEbzBi1hDIOng74
40 nbxnCZ/7E2VNMRC/wOFRVcYxr/D3gETVlwvm2VIsALxF6jdYkWcJmkKM19fURAaO
41 fS5FQVRcXRBL2/1spBSH6Z8/EoYATl1YsylLmncGfOwaD3gAUHZhRqXar82HvSFC
42 uH5MYS96D63loicUE4VDPGekfbKzm8jOhhPXWOCvNDdyQIpitvwe4YdJefNQv3B5
43 8ybmFygQO9/zL0pUwBx8z2V0ciJ+Jb6Vx1+nMrjxYakkJUVsJAnGodeEODh7E4eY
44 3vAst/005dPPPuQbHbxZgS+01ZnRu1Ed1uqfxM0mQpTNKyUg+Dr4lLzEblzGP0AT
45 ct//vkAREZGftWnegsSGGVcT1YHm5GVN3gvtIF5UEWLUJvzlJZlS/rE9rTQopq4U
46 2QyV6VUKzk9NHnDYf9YE
47 =AHJf
48 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] old "masked for testing" entries James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com>