1 |
Piotr Jaroszyński <peper@g.o> said: |
2 |
> Tbh, I don't have any issues with the current solution, but I may be missing |
3 |
> something. "Rationale" doesn't seem to help though, afaics it is just saying |
4 |
> that the current behaviour needs to be documented and fwiw PMS draft covers |
5 |
> this already: |
6 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spb/pms.pdf - section 3.4.3 |
7 |
|
8 |
Which is fine, but PMS is just a draft. I'm trying to see if everyone |
9 |
can accept one solution, instead of throwing things into metadata.xml |
10 |
and into use.local.desc without the process being documented in one place. |
11 |
This is more of a proposal to see if we should even change how we do things |
12 |
today. Maybe we shouldn't, and that's what I'm trying to figure out... |
13 |
|
14 |
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/gleps/glep-0054.html |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Please, don't use an already assigned GLEP number, it's a bit confusing. Note |
17 |
> that 55 is taken as well. |
18 |
|
19 |
It wasn't taken when I first sent it (as far as I know). I forgot to |
20 |
change before resending. Thanks for reminding me. |
21 |
|
22 |
Thanks, |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Mark Loeser |
26 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
27 |
email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
28 |
web - http://www.halcy0n.com |