| 1 |
On Thursday 02 July 2009 11:02:45 Tobias Scherbaum wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > here's an item that should be relatively quick to address: fix the typo |
| 4 |
> > in GLEP 39 where this line is missing (it's been in the council homepage |
| 5 |
> > forever): |
| 6 |
> > Only Gentoo developers may be nominated |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I'd like to add that requirement for proxies as well. Varied |
| 9 |
> interpretations of common sense seems to make that necessary. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
i'd keep them as sep topics as the first should go through quickly without |
| 12 |
discussion. the latter i'm not terribly sold on -- the understanding is that |
| 13 |
a council member should have the good sense to only pick an appropriate proxy. |
| 14 |
the definition of "appropriate" is of course up for grabs. ignoring the |
| 15 |
tools, there is the possibility of bringing non-devs further into the Gentoo |
| 16 |
fold (assuming the proxy is well versed in the topics at hand and not just |
| 17 |
"another body") ... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
then again, looking at the 4 year history, this has never happened, so it's |
| 20 |
doubtful it will happen. guess the proposal is fine. |
| 21 |
-mike |
Archives