| 1 |
> You're somehow implying that being an AT is not as good as being a dev. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Wrong. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> My understanding is that this GLEP is supposed to make AT as good as |
| 6 |
> being a dev, but with a different role, one that doesn't need commit |
| 7 |
> access. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
My point exactly! Why have another category? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> If the people involved decide they want to become committing |
| 12 |
> devs, it also make it easier to make that transition. If they don't |
| 13 |
> want to commit, they can stay as an AT. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Then shall we reclassify all the developers that currently don't have |
| 16 |
commit access to the portage tree? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-Steve |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives