1 |
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 02:40, Brad Laue wrote: |
2 |
> It's extremely wreckless to reject a project of such massive importance |
3 |
> without having a plan first. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I'm not sure if there's *any* output from Xouvert, and from what I'm |
6 |
> told, xserver-freedesktop is not a marketable product, simply a proving |
7 |
> ground for technologies that may or may not appear in an actual X |
8 |
> server. Great. We're not going to be able to pull an alternative out of |
9 |
> our hats as quickly as everyone thinks. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> As dire as the legal implications may be in including 4.4, somehow it |
12 |
> still feels like cutting off your nose to spite your face. |
13 |
|
14 |
Frankly, there is a plan. It hasn't been publicly announced in any |
15 |
official way, since things aren't solid yet. Do you honestly think all |
16 |
these people (pragmatic for the most part) would reject something if |
17 |
there was no chance of a viable alternative? |
18 |
|
19 |
Wait and see what happens. As Seemant likes to say, "Show me the code." |
20 |
Well, the code and the plan aren't quite ready yet. |
21 |
|
22 |
Thanks, |
23 |
Donnie |
24 |
-- |
25 |
Donnie Berkholz |
26 |
Gentoo Linux |