| 1 |
Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> As I've stated in the forums [1], I don't think that picking somebody that |
| 4 |
> was not elected for the chair is a good practice. If you have found that |
| 5 |
> the way elections were conducted did not produce a good result, maybe you |
| 6 |
> should at least change your project description [2]: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> "Gentoo User Representatives (userreps) form part of Gentoo User Relations |
| 9 |
> (userrel) and are elected each year by Gentoo users to represent them to |
| 10 |
> the development community." |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Not that I have something against djay-il, it's just that I don't like the |
| 13 |
> way this whole situation is being handled. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
I don't agree with you. The practicalities mean that since we are mid-term, |
| 16 |
and this is only one post, and there is a candidate the existing team have |
| 17 |
proposed, we should just let them get on with their job. Personally I think |
| 18 |
that'd be a fairly good basis for policy. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives