Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: Mike Frysinger <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:05:35
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role by Mike Frysinger
1 28.2.2006, 21:39:43, Mike Frysinger wrote:
3 > whats your point ? if an ebuild author wants to control the SLOT, then
4 > they should be able to without having an invalid warning issued on the
5 > subject
7 > considering the nature of the warning, it should be trivial to make it into a
8 > proper QA check by having the class see where files were installed and then
9 > warn/abort if certain conditions are met
11 > there's no reason for the user to see this crap
12 > -mike
14 Yeah, and there's no reason for user to see USE_EXPAND QA notice crap,
15 eclass inherited illegally crap and a couple of others - this isn't going
16 anywhere.
18 You are trying to solve something that noone ever complained about. Why not
19 rather solve stuff like ebuilds that depend unconditionally on arts, but
20 because they inherit kde eclass they get bogus arts use flag from the
21 eclass. This is an issue that's truly confusing and that people are filing
22 bugs about. There's the difference between doing something useful and
23 wasting time on an artificially invented issue.
25 --
27 jakub


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>