| 1 |
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:08:43 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:06:06 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > But didn't we already point out that we can't have them in RDEPEND |
| 7 |
> > since they introduce conflicts? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> You are missing a basic and important part of how dependency |
| 10 |
> resolution works: currently, cycles consisting purely of RDEPENDs are |
| 11 |
> ignorable. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
So, what do we lose? If PDEP comes 'ASAP' officially, I believe that we |
| 14 |
actually gain RDEPs which can be actually trusted. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Best regards, |
| 18 |
Michał Górny |
Archives