Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Bracht Laumann Jespersen <t@×××××××.xyz>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: vim@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 0/8] Vim eclasses
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 11:40:17
Message-Id: 20220407114003.rjgvxsae5vnq242c@sofaking
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 0/8] Vim eclasses by Anna Vyalkova
1 Could you post a v4 as a separate thread, and not as a reply to the previous
2 patches? For some reason, neomutt is ordering patches 1 and 2 _after_ the other
3 six making it hard to apply from the mailbox :-) Feel free to drop my initial
4 patches, I think you rework is so much better.
5
6 I looked over sam's requested changes from last year [0], and I think you've
7 addressed all the points. Only one I don't know if was addressed was this one:
8
9 > - In update_vim_afterscripts, the einfo seems (at first glance) to be misleading. \
10 > Should it be printing ${afterdir} instead?
11
12 [0]: https://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=162692547126278&w=2