Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:18:40
Message-Id: 20318.15803.361859.738914@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash by Ciaran McCreesh
1 >>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2
3 > On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:00:32 +0100
4 > Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
5 >> >>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Zac Medico wrote:
6 >> > If we do go with a variant of GLEP 55, I'd prefer a variant that
7 >> > uses a constant extension (like .eb) and places the EAPI string
8 >> > just after the version component of the name. For example:
9 >>
10 >> > foo-1.0-r1-eapi5.ebuild
11 >>
12 >> This is so ugly... I guess I'll retire the same day when such an
13 >> abomination gets accepted. ;-)
14
15 > I'm sorry, we're down to "it's ugly and someone already said no and
16 > I'll throw my toys out of the pram if I don't get my way" as the
17 > arguments against GLEP 55 now?
18
19 Note the smiley in my posting. And yes, it _is_ ugly.
20
21 >>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
22
23 > The person who wrote it is one of Satan's little minions. Also,
24 > change is bad.
25
26 And you think that this is better?
27
28 Ulrich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>