1 |
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 15:29, you wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 25 September 2002 16:09, Chris Bainbridge wrote: |
3 |
> || Twice in the last two days I've had to deal with packaging distribution |
4 |
> || files that have source URIs with the same basenames (eg. I have two |
5 |
> || packages that pull in examples.tar.gz, and a package that gets released |
6 |
> || to a version directory like ${PV}/package.tar.gz). Portage gets |
7 |
> || confused, thinks I already have the file, then fails the checksum. Is |
8 |
> || there any way to override the fetch behaviour in an ebuild, eg. to |
9 |
> || record the full uri like |
10 |
> || /usr/portage/distfiles/http://... ? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> No, you should report the packages that have those same versionless names |
13 |
> to our bugzilla, so the dev can change the name of the package (adding a |
14 |
> version or something), and put it on ibiblio directly. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Thanks! |
17 |
|
18 |
These are ebuilds that I was writing myself, they haven't been added to |
19 |
ebuilds cvs yet. One is proprietory and couldn't be redistributed on ibiblio |
20 |
(http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8312). Any solution here? |
21 |
|
22 |
Oh and I just discovered about adding stuff to /etc/env.d.. the ebuilds I've |
23 |
looked at seem to use xxpacakge for the name, does the xx mean anything or do |
24 |
we just start at 00 and work our way up? |