Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Bainbridge <C.J.Bainbridge@×××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: verwilst@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr/portage/distfiles/ name collisions
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:57:00
Message-Id: 200209251555.29757.C.J.Bainbridge@ed.ac.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr/portage/distfiles/ name collisions by Bart Verwilst
1 On Wednesday 25 September 2002 15:29, you wrote:
2 > On Wednesday 25 September 2002 16:09, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
3 > || Twice in the last two days I've had to deal with packaging distribution
4 > || files that have source URIs with the same basenames (eg. I have two
5 > || packages that pull in examples.tar.gz, and a package that gets released
6 > || to a version directory like ${PV}/package.tar.gz). Portage gets
7 > || confused, thinks I already have the file, then fails the checksum. Is
8 > || there any way to override the fetch behaviour in an ebuild, eg. to
9 > || record the full uri like
10 > || /usr/portage/distfiles/http://... ?
11 >
12 > No, you should report the packages that have those same versionless names
13 > to our bugzilla, so the dev can change the name of the package (adding a
14 > version or something), and put it on ibiblio directly.
15 >
16 > Thanks!
17
18 These are ebuilds that I was writing myself, they haven't been added to
19 ebuilds cvs yet. One is proprietory and couldn't be redistributed on ibiblio
20 (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8312). Any solution here?
21
22 Oh and I just discovered about adding stuff to /etc/env.d.. the ebuilds I've
23 looked at seem to use xxpacakge for the name, does the xx mean anything or do
24 we just start at 00 and work our way up?